HMRC doubles up on SEISS tax
HMRC’s latest guidance on Self-Employment Income Support Scheme (SEISS) payments warns that some taxpayers may be taxed on them twice. What steps are required to prevent this?
HMRC says that many of the 2020/21 self-assessment tax returns it’s received either include entries for SEISS payments that don’t match the figures it has on record or show nothing at all. As a result, it’s automatically amending those returns and sending out corrected tax calculations.
Taxpayers should of course check HMRC’s amended figures to make sure they reflect only the total of the first, second or third SEISS grants received on or before 5 April 2021. But that’s not all. They should also check that theyreported the SEISS payments in the right box on the tax return. HMRC’s latest guidance instructs where the payments should be shown.
If figures have been entered in the wrong place HMRC will assume the taxpayer hasn’t declared the payments at all. It will automatically add them which will result in the individual being taxed twice on the SEISS payments. To avoid this double taxation, an amended tax return should be submitted, reporting the SEISS figures in the right place and removing them from the part of the tax return where they were originally included.
Related Topics
-
The tax incentive to do a thorough stock-take
The annual stock-take isn’t exactly your favourite thing to do. You know resources could be better spent elsewhere so you try to get through it as quickly as possible. Why might it be worth a little more of your time?
-
Unused sales suppression tools can still trigger penalties
HMRC has published a new compliance factsheet explaining the penalties that can apply where a business possesses an electronic sales suppression (ESS) tool, even if it has never actually been used to suppress a sale. What do you need to know?
-
Accounting for VAT if there is no cash payment
Your business has submitted repayment returns for the last two quarters and you are concerned that you might have underpaid output tax on some supplies where no money has changed hands. Are your concerns justified?