Tribunal rejects reliance on adviser as reasonable excuse
A recent First-tier Tribunal decision has confirmed that relying on an accountant does not automatically amount to a reasonable excuse for missing a self-assessment deadline. The case highlights the limits of delegating tax responsibilities. What does this mean in practice?
In the case, the taxpayer argued that their failure to file on time was due to reliance on their adviser, who had been responsible for handling their tax affairs. HMRC rejected this explanation and issued late filing penalties. The tribunal agreed with HMRC. It found that while taxpayers may appoint an agent, responsibility for meeting filing deadlines ultimately remains with the taxpayer. Simply assuming that an adviser will deal with matters is not sufficient to establish a reasonable excuse.
The decision reflects a consistent line in tribunal cases that reliance on a third party will only amount to a reasonable excuse in limited circumstances, such as where the taxpayer has taken reasonable steps to ensure compliance and an unexpected failure occurs. The practical message is clear. Even where an accountant is engaged, you should ensure deadlines are understood and met. Regular communication with advisers and monitoring of filing obligations can help prevent avoidable penalties.
Related Topics
-
HMRC writes to non-domiciled taxpayers following rule changes
HMRC has begun issuing “one-to-many” letters to individuals affected by recent changes to the tax rules for non-UK domiciled taxpayers. The letters prompt recipients to review their tax position under the new regime. What does this mean if you receive one?
-
Can officers ignore minor input tax errors?
If your business has claimed input tax on an invoice where the supplier has charged VAT incorrectly, HMRC can disallow your claim by issuing an assessment. Can the officer waive that power to achieve a common sense outcome?
-
Practical guide: Tax-efficient will planning with residential property
An individual has a significant property portfolio which provides them with their sole source of income. They want to gift shares in some property to their daughter but retain the income. Can they do this without triggering the reservation of benefit rules?