Beating the capital allowances rate reduction
The main rate of relief for capital allowances is reducing from 18% to 14% from April 2026. Is this something that’s likely to affect you and if so, what can you do to make the most of the current rate?
Writing down allowances
Writing down allowances (WDAs) give tax relief for capital expenditure where first-year allowances cannot be claimed and, where the cash basis is used, where the expenditure is of a type for which a deduction is not permitted. For expenditure on cars (other than new zero emissions cars), WDAs are the only route for relief.
WDAs apply on a reducing balance basis, and different rates apply to main rate and special rate expenditure. Most items of plant and machinery are main rate assets, including cars with CO2 emissions of 50g/km or less. Currently, main rate expenditure attracts relief of 18% per year. However, this is to be reduced to 14% per year from 6 April 2026 for income tax purposes and 1 April 2026 for corporation tax purposes.
Who’s affected?
As companies benefit from full expensing, and most businesses are entitled to the annual investment allowance (AIA) of £1m, the impact is limited. It will affect businesses purchasing cars with CO2 emissions of 50g/km or less, those with brought forward balances and unincorporated businesses that aren’t entitled to the AIA or have exhausted it.
The reduction in the main rate from April 2026 will result in pool balances taking longer to receive full tax relief.
Hybrid rates
If a company’s year end is anything other than 31 March, the reduced rate impacts the rate used for the entire year, not just expenditure incurred post-1 April. In these circumstances, a hybrid rate applies to reflect the proportion of the chargeable accounting period that falls before and after 1 April.
Example. Joe operates his business through a company, J Ltd. Accounts are prepared to 30 June each year. On 1 May 2026, J Ltd buys a new hybrid car with CO2 emissions of 20g/km, costing £36,000. J Ltd cannot use the AIA or full expensing to get full relief for the cost of the car. The expenditure is therefore added to the main rate pool, which has a balance of £40,000 on 1 July 2025. As the year to 30 June 2026 spans 1 April 2026, a hybrid rate applies. For that year, 274 days fall before 1 April 2026 and 91 days fall on or after 1 April 2026. Consequently, the hybrid rate is 17% ((274/365 x 18%) + (91/365 x 14%)). J Ltd is able to claim main rate WDAs for the year to 30 June 2026 of £12,920 (17% of (£40,000 + £36,000)).
If J Ltd’s year end was 31 March, the value of the car would have been subject to the lower rate of 14%, reducing the tax relief by more than £1,000.
Companies with year ends spanning 1 April 2026 are subject to a hybrid rate, regardless of when the expenditure is incurred. Therefore, there is no need to bring expenditure forward to pre-1 April 2026.
Planning for unincorporated businesses
There is some good news for unincorporated businesses. They are always taxed on a tax year basis, regardless of the date accounts are drawn to. This means there’s no need to make fiddly adjustments for hybrid rates as it is simply 18% for 2025/26 and 14% for 2026/27.
Bring any planned expenditure forward to pre- 6 April 2026 if it will be allocated to the main rate pool. There’s no change to the special rate (6%).
Related Topics
-
Selling spare items to your company
You’re short of cash but if you use the traditional methods to take more money out of your company you’ll pay higher rate taxes. Is there another way to extract profits without paying income tax or NI?
-
No such thing as a (tax) free lunch?
You run a small consultancy company and treat your staff to lunch in the office once a week. Your bookkeeper says it’s a taxable benefit in kind because staff lunches are only exempt if they are provided in a workplace canteen. Is this correct?
-
Judge criticises use of fabricated AI-generated cases in HMRC appeal
A tax tribunal judge has criticised the use of apparently fabricated case references generated by artificial intelligence in an appeal against HMRC. The incident highlights growing concerns over the use of AI tools in legal and tax proceedings. What happened?